<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>JEOL Resources</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads</link><item><title>JMS-S3000 SpiralTOF™ series Imaging Applications Notebook 2023</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/jms-s3000-spiraltof-series-imaging-applications-notebook-2023</link><category>MALDI Imaging</category><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 17:51:11 GMT</pubDate><summary>This is a compendium of mass spectrometry imaging applications notes and JEOL News articles based on the data acquired on JEOL ultra-high mass-resolution MALDI-TOFMS JMS-S3000 SpiralTOF™ series.</summary><description>&lt;p&gt;Edition August 2023&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a compendium of mass spectrometry imaging applications notes and JEOL News articles based on the data acquired on JEOL ultra-high mass-resolution MALDI-TOFMS JMS-S3000 SpiralTOF™ series.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Table of Contents&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Introduction and Fundamentals　P1～&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Mass Spectrometry Imaging using the JMS-S3000 "SpiralTOF™-plus" Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (Takaya Satoh, JEOL News, 55, 70-72, 2020)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Development of JMS-S3000: MALDI-TOF/TOF Utilizing a Spiral Ion Trajectory (Takaya Satoh, JEOL News, 45, 34-37, 2010)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;High Mass Resolution MALDI-Imaging MS – High Stability of Peak Position during Imaging MS Measurement (MSTips No. 193)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The Relationship between Crystal Condition and Mass Resolving Power, Mass Accuracy (MSTips No.206)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;div&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Life Science / Biomolecules　P17〜&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;High mass-resolution MS imaging using JMS-S3000 "SpiralTOF™" and statistical data analysis (MSTips No. 370)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;High Mass-Resolution MALDI-imaging MS for Drug Metabolism in Tissue Using the JMS-S3000 (MSTips No. 212)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;High Mass Resolution MALDI-imaging MS Using JMS-S3000 SpiralTOF™ and msMicroImager (MSTips No. 211)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Fingerprint Analyses Using MALDI Imaging and SEM Imaging (MSTips No. 208)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;MALDI-Imaging MS of Lipids on Mouse Brain Tissue Sections Using Negative Ion Mode (MSTips No. 196)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Polymers / Materials　P35〜&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Degradation analysis of polyethylene terephthalate film by UV irradiation using imaging mass spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy (HS05)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Mass spectrometry imaging for degradation of polyethylene terephthalate by UV irradiation using JMS-S3000 "SpiralTOF™-plus" (MSTips No. 307)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;A mass spectrometry imaging method for visualizing synthetic polymers combined with Kendrick mass defect analysis (MSTips No. 306)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;A mass spectrometry imaging method for visualizing synthetic polymers by using average molecular weight and polydispersity as indices. (MSTips No. 305)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Mass spectrometry imaging on mixed conductive/non-conductive substrate using JMS-S3000 SpiralTOF™ (MSTips No. 288)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Analysis of organic compounds on an acrylic plate using JMS-S3000 "SpiralTOF™" (MSTips No. 251)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Ballpoint Ink Analyses Using LDI Imaging and SEM/EDS Techniques (MSTips No. 204)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Gunshot Residues (GSR) Analysis by Using MALDI Imaging&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Analysis of Organic Thin Films by the Laser Desorption/Ionization Method Using the JMS-S3000 "SpiralTOF™" (Satoh, T., JEOL News, 49, 81-88, 2014)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MALDI-TOFMS imaging system JEOL×SCiLS</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/maldi-tofms-imaging-system-jeolscils</link><category>MS Product Brochures</category><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:13:44 GMT</pubDate><summary>Advanced statistical analysis of MALDI MS imaging data acquired by SpiralTOF™-plus while taking full advantage of its high mass-resolving power</summary><description>&lt;h3&gt;JMS-S3000 SpiralTOF™-plus MALDI-TOFMS imaging system&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;High mass-resolving power and high mass accuracy achieved by JEOL's unique SpiralTOF ion optics with 17 m flight path.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;High mass-resolution can be achieved even for an imaging specimen with uneven surface.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Chemical noise in low m/z region is significantly reduced as PSD (post-source decay) ions are eliminated by the electric sectors used in the SpiralTOF ion optics.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Highly selective spatial distribution can be obtained by separating target analytes from interferences with high mass-resolution.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;SCiLS™ – We turn data into knowledge!&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;h4&gt;SCiLS Lab MVS&lt;br /&gt;
Software for MS imaging data analysis&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Data analysis based on the vendor-neutral imzML format&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;2D and 3D visualization allows a multitude of applications in pharmaceutical, medical, and industrial research&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Advanced processing and analysis with next generation machine learning algorithms&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;div&gt;▶ Comparative analysis&lt;br /&gt;
▶ Co-localization analysis&lt;br /&gt;
▶ Spatial segmentation&lt;br /&gt;
▶ Component analysis&lt;br /&gt;
▶ Classification model calculation&lt;br /&gt;
▶ On-tissue quantitation&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Click to Download the Full Brochure Below&lt;/h3&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MALDI imaging brochure</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/maldi-imaging-brochure</link><category>MS Product Brochures</category><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:04:15 GMT</pubDate><summary>Advanced statistical analysis of MALDI MS imaging data required by SpiralTOF-plus while taking full advantage of its high mass-resolving power.</summary><description>&lt;p&gt;Advanced statistical analysis of MALDI MS imaging data required by SpiralTOF-plus while taking full advantage of its high mass-resolving power.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Click Below To View The Brochure.&lt;/h3&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SpiralTOF Imaging Applications Notebook 2020</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/spiraltof-imaging-applications-notebook-2020</link><category>MALDI Imaging</category><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:10:00 GMT</pubDate><summary>Applications concerning MALDI MS Imaging using the SpiralTOF.</summary><description>&lt;p&gt;Applications concerning MALDI MS Imaging using the SpiralTOF.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Please click below to Download&lt;/h3&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Degradation of PET by UV irradiation using S3000 - MSTips 307</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/degradation-of-pet-by-uv-irradiation-using-s3000-mstips-307</link><category>MALDI SpiralTOF™-TOF</category><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:04:46 GMT</pubDate><summary>In this report, we have applied this combined method to analyze a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) that was degraded by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation.</summary><description>&lt;p style="margin-top:0in; margin-right:1.65pt; margin-bottom:8.0pt; margin-left:-5.6pt; margin:0in 0in 8pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"&gt;Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the analysis of synthetic polymers. This technique, when combined with a high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometer, can be used to identify differences in monomer, polymer end groups, and their molecular weight distributions. The molecular weight distribution is often expressed as number average molecular weight (M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;), weight average molecular weight (M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;), and dispersity (D). More recently, MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) has been used to visualize the locations of compounds on sample surfaces. However, this technique has not been widely used for polymer analysis. Previously in MSTips 306, we reported combining M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;, M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt; and D visualization methods with Kendrick mass defect (KMD) analysis. In this report, we have applied this combined method to analyze a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) that was degraded by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Degradation analysis of PET film by UV irradiation using MALDI-MSI &amp; FE-SEM-HS05</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/degradation-analysis-of-pet-film-by-uv-irradiation-using-maldi-msi-fe-sem-hs05</link><category>Yokogushi (Cross-platform Analysis)</category><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:02 GMT</pubDate><summary>In this report, we have expanded MALDI-MSI to analyzing a PET film that was exposed to UV radiation. Additionally, a SEM was used to look at the morphological differences in the PET film before and after UV irradiation.</summary><description>&lt;h2&gt;Degradation analysis of polyethylene terephthalate film by UV irradiation using imaging mass spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Product: JMS-S3000, JSM-7200F&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Surface analysis equipment is commonly used to evaluate industrial material for information such as elements, bonding states, and functional groups on the sample surface. However, commonly used tools like scanning electron microscopes (SEM) are not able to provide the elemental composition or structural information about the organic compounds present in/on the sample. Conversely, organic mass spectrometry (MS) can provide this information for organic molecules on surfaces and in the bulk material. Among the MS techniques available, matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the analysis of synthetic polymers. By using MALDI with a high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometer and Kendrick mass defect (KMD) analysis, polymer materials can be quickly analyzed to identify differences in monomer, polymer end groups, and their molecular weight distributions. More recently, MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) has been used to visualize the locations of compounds on sample surfaces, thus suggesting that it is possible to obtain polymer molecular information present on sample surfaces, which is not possible by conventional surface analysis methods like SEM. In a previous report [1], we showed the effects of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation degradation for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) spots. In this report, we have expanded MALDI-MSI to analyzing a PET film that was exposed to UV radiation. Additionally, a SEM was used to look at the morphological differences in the PET film before and after UV irradiation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Experimental&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A 30 µm-thick PET film was used for the sample. First, the right-half of the PET film was masked with aluminum foil, and then UV irradiated for 30 minutes using Handicure 100 (manufactured by Mizuka Planning Co., Ltd.).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/HS05_1.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Figure 1.&lt;/strong&gt; Schematic of the irradiation region of PET film using ultraviolet ray.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2,4,6-Trihydroxyacetophenone (THAP) was used as the matrix, and sodium trifluoroacetate (NaTFA) was used as the cationizing agent. THAP and NaTFA were dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at concentrations of 10 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL, respectively. A THAP and NaTFA mixture (10:1 v/v) solution was sprayed on the PET film with an airbrush.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The MALDI-MSI measurements were done by using the JMS-S3000 in SpiralTOF positive ion mode. The pixel size for the MSI images was 50 µm. The msMicroImager&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt; software was used for MSI analysis, and msRepeatFinder was used for KMD analysis. A JSM-7200F field emission scanning electron microscope (FE- SEM), was used to look at the surface morphology using the conditions listed in Figure 2.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Figure 2 shows the secondary electron images for the PET film surface before (A, B) and after (C, D) UV irradiation. These results were obtained by SEM without coating the sample for analysis. In particular, secondary electrons emitted from the sample surface are sensitive to irregularities which makes it suitable for looking at changes in sample surfaces. Figures 2A and B show the secondary electron images before UV irradiation (magnifications of 50,000 and 100,000, respectively), in which the PET surface is smooth. On the other hand, Figure 2C and D show the secondary electron images after UV irradiation (magnifications of 50,000 and 100,000, respectively), in which surface irregularities of approximately 100nm were observed. These results show that SEMs are effective for observing changes in morphology and nanostructures on sample surfaces.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/HS05_2.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Figure 2.&lt;/strong&gt; Secondary electron image of PET film surface before (A,B) and after (C,D) ultraviolet irradiation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FE-SEM conditions were Acceleration voltage: 0.8 kV, Signal：Secondary electron image, Pretreatment：without coating.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Figure 3A shows the averaged mass spectrum for the entire measurement area. Figure 3B shows the C&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;8&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; KMD plot for the average mass spectrum in which eight different PET series (192u intervals) were identified. Series I thru IV are exactly the same series observed previously in MSTips 307. These series were identified as sodium adduct ions for (I) cyclic oligomer, (II) COOH/COOH end groups, (III) cyclic oligomer + C&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O, and (IV) COOH/OH end groups, respectively. Series I and III are components that were present before ultraviolet irradiation, and Series II and IV are the components that appear after ultraviolet irradiation. The Series I and II images (Figure 4A and 4B) were generated by summing the mass image intensities included in the KMD plot blue and red groups, respectively. The Series I ion intensities are relatively low in the irradiated side (left) so this means that UV irradiation reduces the presence of this series (Figure 4A). On the other hand, the Series II ion intensities are relatively high in the irradiated side (left) so this means that UV irradiation increases the presence of this series (Figure 4B). To show this degradation more clearly, Figure 4C normalizes Series II to Series I by ratioing their ion intensities (Series II/I) in each pixel. Figure 5 shows the Series II to VIII images using Series I for normalization (2×2 pixel binning). Figure 5 clearly shows that the Series III, V, and VIII, which have the same color tone for both the irradiated and unirradiated sections, are present in the sample regardless of UV irradiation. However, Series II, IV, VI, and VII show brighter color areas for the irradiated section of the sample, thus indicating that these PET series are generated by irradiating the surface with UV light.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this report, we compared UV irradiated and non-irradiated PET thin films by using FE-SEM to observe morphology changes on the surface and MALDI-MSI to detect changes in molecular information on the film surface. Each technique provided complementary information about the UV degradation of a PET thin film.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;References&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;[1] MSTips 307 “Mass spectrometry imaging for degradation of polyethylene terephthalate by UV irradiation using JMS-S3000 "SpiralTOF&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt;-plus"”&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/HS05_3.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Figure 3.&lt;/strong&gt; (A) Averaged mass spectrum for the MSI measurement region and (B) KMD plot (base unit C&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;8&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;, X=192). The KMD plot easily showed the presence of eight PET series (I) – (VIII).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/HS05_4.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Figure 4.&lt;/strong&gt; Images of (A) the cyclic oligomer of PET series (Series I), (B) the ultraviolet degraded PET polymer series (Series II), and (C) Series II normalized to Series I.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/HS05_5.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Figure 5.&lt;/strong&gt; The PET Series II –VIII images normalized with the Series I image.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MS imaging for visualizing synthetic polymers using average MW and p as indices - MSTips 305</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/ms-imaging-for-visualizing-synthetic-polymers-using-average-mw-and-p-as-indices-mstips-305</link><category>MALDI SpiralTOF™</category><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:19:28 GMT</pubDate><summary>In this report, we investigate a MSI visualization method for synthetic polymers that uses Mn, Mw and D as indices for visualization.</summary><description>&lt;p style="margin-top:0in; margin-right:1.65pt; margin-bottom:8.0pt; margin-left:-5.6pt; margin:0in 0in 8pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"&gt;Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the analysis of synthetic polymers. This technique, when combined with a high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometer, can be used to identify differences in monomer, polymer end groups, and their molecular weight distributions. The molecular weight distribution is often expressed as number average molecular weight (M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;), weight average molecular weight (M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;), and dispersity (D). More recently, MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) has been used to visualize the locations of compounds on sample surfaces. The MALDI-MSI raw data includes the position information (X and Y) as well as the mass spectral information (&lt;i&gt;m/z&lt;/i&gt; and intensity) for each position. A target compound peak can then be specified to calculate the ion intensity for each pixel in order to draw a mass image. MALDI-MSI has been widely used to show the localization of proteins, peptides, lipids, and drugs on frozen tissue sections. However, this technique has not been widely used for polymer analysis. One reason for this is that polymers have molecular weight distributions which means that mass images based on specific degrees of polymerization (specific &lt;i&gt;m/z&lt;/i&gt; value typically used by conventional methods) do not necessarily express a clear picture for the full polymer localization. In this report, we investigate a MSI visualization method for synthetic polymers that uses M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;,&lt;sub&gt; &lt;/sub&gt;M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt; and D as indices for visualization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MS imaging for visualizing synthetic polymers combined with KMD - MSTips - 306</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/ms-imaging-for-visualizing-synthetic-polymers-combined-with-kmd-mstips-306</link><category>MALDI SpiralTOF™</category><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:04:23 GMT</pubDate><summary>In this report, we have combined this method with the Kendrick Mass Defect (KMD) method to effectively visualize polymer series mixtures.</summary><description>&lt;h2&gt;A mass spectrometry imaging method for visualizing synthetic polymers combined with Kendrick mass defect analysis&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Product: JMS-S3000&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the analysis of synthetic polymers. This technique, when combined with a high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometer, can be used to identify differences in monomer, polymer end groups, and their molecular weight distributions. The molecular weight distribution is often expressed as number average molecular weight (M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;), weight average molecular weight (M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;), and dispersity (D). More recently, MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) has been used to visualize the locations of compounds on sample surfaces. However, this technique has not been widely used for polymer analysis. One reason for this is that polymers have molecular weight distributions which means that mass images based on specific degrees of polymerization (specific &lt;i&gt;m/z&lt;/i&gt; value typically used by conventional methods) do not necessarily express a clear picture for the full polymer localization. In the previous MSTips 305 report [1], we proposed a new MALDI-MSI visualization method for synthetic polymers that used the M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;, M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt; and D as indices. In this report, we have combined this method with the Kendrick Mass Defect (KMD) method to effectively visualize polymer series mixtures.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Experimental&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A model sample was prepared using polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyethylene glycol monododecyl ether (PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt;), and polypropylene glycol (PPG) .The reagents used are shown in Table 1. A mixed solution of PEG, PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt;, α-CHCA, and NaTFA 1/0.1/10/1 (v/v/v/v) was spotted on the left-hand spot, and a mixed solution of PEG, PPG, α-CHCA, and NaTFA 1/0.1/10/1 (v/v/v/v) was spotted on the right-hand spot (Figure 1). The MALDI-MSI data was measured by using the SpiralTOF positive ion mode on the JMS-S3000. The pixel size was 50 μm, and the laser irradiation frequency was 50 times for each pixel. The MSI analysis and visualization was performed by using the JEOL msMicroImager™&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;software, and the KMD analysis was performed by using the JEOL msRepeatFinder™ software.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table class="table"&gt;
	&lt;tbody&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Samples&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;
			&lt;p&gt;Polyethylene glycol (PEG) M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;2000&lt;/p&gt;

			&lt;p&gt;Polyethylene glycol monododecyl ether (PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;

			&lt;p&gt;Polypropylene glycol (PPG) M&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt; 2000&lt;/p&gt;

			&lt;p&gt;1mg/mL (in MeOH)&lt;/p&gt;
			&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Matrix&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;
			&lt;p&gt;α-CHCA 10mg/mL (in MeOH)&lt;/p&gt;
			&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Cationization&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;
			&lt;p&gt;NaTFA 1mg/mL (in MeOH)&lt;/p&gt;
			&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
	&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 1.&lt;/strong&gt; Samples, matrix and cationization agent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/MSTips 306 Fig. 1.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Fig. 1.&lt;/strong&gt; Schematic of the model sample.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The average mass spectrum for the entire sample region (right-hand and left-hand spots) is shown in Figure 2A. Two polymer distributions with repeat units of 44 u (C&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O) were easily observed around &lt;i&gt;m/z&lt;/i&gt; 900-1800 and &lt;i&gt;m/z&lt;/i&gt; 1500-2800 that corresponded with PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt; and PEG 2000, respectively. However, the polypropylene series with repeat units 58 u (C&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;6&lt;/sub&gt;O) was more difficult to observe in the average mass spectrum. The C&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O KMD plot for the average mass spectrum is shown in Figure 2B. This plot clearly showed the presence of three polymer series as highlighted by the three colors (blue, red, and green). The two major series for PEG2000 (colored with blue) and PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt; (colored with red), which both have C&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O monomer units, made a horizontal line across the KMD plot. The minor series for PPG2000 (colored with green) showed a sloped line due to the fact that it has a repeat unit of C&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;6&lt;/sub&gt;O. These results clearly show the advantage of using a KMD plot to easily visualize polymer series, even with low intensity ions that can be difficult to observe in the mass spectrum. Using the KMD plot, three polymer peak lists were extracted from the average mass spectrum peak list and images for M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt; and D were made for each polymer series. The PEG, PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt; and PPG polymer peak lists contained 216, 84, and 70 peaks, respectively. It would be time consuming to use conventional methods that involve looking at all 370 mass images individually to make any reasonable determinations about the samples. However, the M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt; and D were easily calculated using each extracted peak list. The corresponding M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt; and D images for each polymer series are shown in Figure 3. From these images, the M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt; values of PEG, PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt; and PPG were approximately 2200, 1350 and 2200, respectively, and the D values of PEG, PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt; and PPG were approximately 1.01, 1.015 and 1.008, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-top:0in; margin-right:-28.05pt; margin-bottom:8.0pt; margin-left:-14.2pt; margin:0in 0in 8pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/MSTips 306 Fig. 2.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fig. 2.&lt;/strong&gt; (A) Averaged mass spectrum showing two clearly defined polymer series with a repeat unit of 44 u (C&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O). (B) KMD plot (based on C&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O) for the entire peak list from the averaged mass spectrum. The PEG and PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt; polymer series were observed as horizontal lines across the plot. Also, the PPG series that was difficult to find in the mass spectrum is clearly observed in the KMD plot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/2/images/AI/MSTips 306 Fig. 3.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fig. 3.&lt;/strong&gt; The M&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;and D&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;images for PEG, PEG-C&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;25&lt;/sub&gt; and PPG polymer series.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this report, we have introduced the advantages of combining KMD analysis with the visualizing method reported in MSTips 305 to analyze samples containing multiple synthetic polymer series. By using the KMD method, it is easy to visualize each polymer series, even for minor components that are difficult to identify in the mass spectrum.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;References&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;[1]MSTips 305 A mass spectrometry imaging method for visualizing synthetic polymers by using average molecular weight and polydispersity as indices.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Tissue imaging with high mass-resolving power and high-energy CID</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/tissue-imaging-with-high-mass-resolving-power-and-high-energy-cid</link><category>MALDI Imaging</category><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:46:18 GMT</pubDate><summary>The JMS-S3000 is based on JEOL's proprietary SpiralTOF ion optic system that offers the highest resolving power available in a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. The unique properties of the SpiralTOF provide a new level of performance in MALDI imaging.</summary><description>&lt;h3&gt;High resolution mass spectrometry imaging&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In MALDI imaging mass spectrometry, the sample is moved beneath the focused laser beam to create a time-dependent series of mass spectra where each time corresponds to a specific spatial location. Analysis of the data allows the researcher to visualize the spatial distribution of specific compounds on the sample surface. Because the SpiralTOF’s 17-meter flight path minimizes the effect of topographic variations on the sample surface, high mass-resolving power can be maintained for tissue imaging.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MSI) on mixed conductive/non-conductive substrate using JMS-S3000 SpiralTOF™  - MSTips - 288</title><link>https://www.jeolusa.com/RESOURCES/Analytical-Instruments/Documents-Downloads/mass-spectrometry-imaging-on-mixed-conductivenon-conductive-substrate-using-jms-s3000-spiraltoftm</link><category>MALDI Imaging</category><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:43:07 GMT</pubDate><summary>In the industrial field, there is interest in measuring organic compounds on non-conductive substrates, such as resins a few millimeters thick. If the mass spectrum is obtained from the non-conductive surface with no pre-treatment, the mass resolution will be lower, and ultimately the ion intensity will decrease significantly due to the charge-up effect. This issue can be solved by providing conductivity to the non-conductive part via the gold deposition method.[1] In this report, MSI is performed using a permanent red marker on a substrate with a conductive part and a non-conductive part. Previously, ions could be observed only from the conductive part. Now, with the gold deposition method, they can be observed from both the conductive and the non-conductive parts, and they can be properly mapped.</summary><description>&lt;h3&gt;Experimental&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To create a model substrate, we formed conductive and non-conductive parts using metal patterns (Au 100 nm/Cr 30 nm) on a 1-mm-thick quartz glass substrate, alternating conductive with non-conductive parts at intervals of 400 μm. We used a red permanent marker to ionize the main component without applying a matrix compound. The letters "MS" were written with this marker so that they straddled the conductive and non-conductive parts on the model substrate. We then fixed the model substrate and the stainless-steel target plate with conductive tape (Fig. 2). Mass spectrometry imaging was performed without gold deposition. Thereafter, we used gold deposition on the same sample and performed mass spectrometry imaging again. All mass spectrometry imaging were performed in SpiralTOF positive-ion mode. Pixel size was 50 μm; number of laser shots was 50 per pixel.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>